IT SHOULD BE CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD BY ALL THAT THE EDITION OF THE 1962 MISSAL PUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1964 IS IDENTICAL TO THE EDITIO TYPICA OF THE MISSAL PUBLISHED IN 1962 IN EVERY RESPECT EXCEPT THAT THE PARTS OF THE MASS ENUMERATED ABOVE a) THROUGH g) ARE IN ENGLISH INSTEAD OF LATIN. ALL RUBRICS, ALL PRAYERS, ALL OTHER TEXTS ARE IDENTICAL IN BOTH THE 1962 AND THE 1964 EDITIONS OF THE MISSAL OF BLESSED POPE JOHN XXIII.
The use of the vernacular (English) in the celebration of the Extraordinary Form of the Mass is therefore legitimate and is clearly in keeping with the mind of the Second Vatican Council and Pope Benedict XVI.
Nice try. But, Summorum Pontificum clearly states in Article 1:
It is, therefore, permissible to celebrate the Sacrifice of the Mass following the typical edition of the Roman Missal promulgated by Bl. John XXIII in 1962 and never abrogated, as an extraordinary form of the Liturgy of the Church.
Doesn't say anything about the Missal published in 1964. But we shouldn't be surprised that certain folks are so intent on ruining this great gift of our Holy Father to the Church. Just wait until the reports start filtering in of girl altar boys, lay Eucharistic ministers, lay people reading the Epistle from the ambo and people receiving Communion in the hand at the Extraordinary Form of Holy Mass. It's coming. They can't resist sticking their finger in the eye of traddies.
We couldn't be content with our limited, but reverent, celebrations of the traditional Mass, could we? Nope, we just had to have the Motu Proprio. And now our Mass is going to be corrupted by post-Conciliar B.S. Lovely.
Be careful what you pray for. Sometimes God says yes.......